As a result of my super-dee-dooper new cell phone, I’ve got a new number for you all to take down:
(917) 328-8233
But, you say, you have been talking all this shit at us about number portability, and how it is a Good Thing and no one need ever change their number again. Why do you not port your old number to the new phone? I hear this, but I just do not want the old 347 number. The fact of the matter is that my bourgeois conceits have led me to believe that a 347 area code is beneath me. I am a child of 212 and I will not be beholden to an area code that is too young to be potty-trained. The damn thing didn’t exist until I was in college, and it’s the third overlay on the New York area. If area codes are going to have little to with geography (and soon nothing at all to do with it), then I at least want one with some history, FFS.
917 makes me feel much better than 347 ever could; this number of mine has been through plenty of devices, I’m sure. From pagers to car phones, 917 was the currency of the wireless realm for many moons, and my nifty number, only needing three keys, could have been used by kings and princes (or him).
This is not intended as a diatribe against those with 347 numbers. I only wish to lead by example; to show the huddled masses that there is an escape from the ‘freedom’ of number portability. It is merely a choice each man must make: to knuckle under to the system which keeps the good numbers in blocks for fat cats and corporate exchanges, or to cast off the shackles of 347 and say you deserve better. You have nothing to lose but a wack-ass phone number.
evan :: Dec.15.2003 ::
Notices ::
13 Comments »